Open APIs

 View Only
  • 1.  TMF-654 Example json has fields which are missing from resource model

    Posted Feb 19, 2021 09:45
      |   view attached
    Hi. In TMF-654 prepay balance management user guide. I see some discrepancies in example JSON and resource model.

    Bucket resource doesn't have field called bucketBalance.
    However in API operation GET /bucket?fields example JSON has bucketBalance field. How come this field appeared in example JSON which is missing from resource model?

    I have attached the example json as txt file.

    And swagger document of 654 is missing POST and DELETE operation for Bucket resource. API operations are listed in user guide




    ------------------------------
    ~Dheeraj Joshi

    Nokia
    dheeraj.joshi@nokia.com
    ------------------------------

    Attachment(s)

    txt
    TMF654-Example.json.txt   1 KB 1 version


  • 2.  RE: TMF-654 Example json has fields which are missing from resource model

    TM Forum Member
    Posted Feb 22, 2021 01:17

    Hello Dheeraj,

    Missing BUCKET POST API is acknowledged from the community and @Ludovic Robert confirmed on following it up internally.
    Please the discussion TMF654 - Bucket POST API - Missing/Incorrect Specs for more details.

    In my understanding bucketBalance was old representation and as per revised specs, either monetary or non-monetary, each bucket has an independent representation.
    But, for confirmation, even I have posted the similar query on discussion topic TMF654 - Bucket GET API - Missing Non-Monetary Representation.

    Thanks.



    ------------------------------
    Karan Agrawal
    Oracle Corporation
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: TMF-654 Example json has fields which are missing from resource model

    Posted Mar 12, 2021 06:11
    HI, I am interested to know if there is some work ongoing on this thread? @Ludovic Robert , will be great if you can provide some pointer?

    ------------------------------
    Surender Prakash Sharma
    BSS Solutioning, Nokia
    Commentary on Forum are my personal views and does not represent my company, Nokia.
    ------------------------------