Task resource pattern defined in
TMF630 DG 3.0 Part 1 states below
"There are use cases:
- when a task request is simple and there is no need to persist the request but the server may choose to persist the request in any case, e.g. for accounting purposes
- long running task when there is a need to persist the request in order to monitor it."
Question: Is the monitor only the allowed way to retrieve information around task? Can async notification pattern (hub & listener) be used for task?
"It is not recommended to delete a task but rather to cancel the task with PATCH."
Question: What is the rationale behind this statement? Why is this restricted?
------------------------------
Abdul Majid Hussain
Telstra Corporation
------------------------------