Open APIs

Expand all | Collapse all

TMF653 Conformance Profile for Service Test Resource?

  • 1.  TMF653 Conformance Profile for Service Test Resource?

    Posted Apr 14, 2021 09:53
    Edited by Marlon Almazan Apr 19, 2021 09:17
    Hi All,

    This question is around the TMF653 Conformance Profile for testMeasure.ruleViolation.

    A new field conformanceTargetExact has been introduced in v4 to cater for values that are not numerical test metrics.
    There can be scenarios where certain rule  essay writer requires only the conformanceTargetExact and both TargetLower or TargetUpper may not be present in such case.

    The conformance Rule mentioned in the document for conformanceTargetLower, conformanceTargetUpper,conformanceComparatorLower, conformanceComparatorUpper is both M and O which I am unable to completely understand. The 2nd statement "Threshold may be defined without the condition that you define both Upper and Lower one of them is sufficient." makes sense though.

    Please advice on this.

    ShepherdKai ShepherdKai

  • 2.  RE: TMF653 Conformance Profile for Service Test Resource?

    TM Forum Member
    Posted Apr 14, 2021 10:39
    Hi, there was an omission in v4.0 for the conformance on TargetExact that was missing. Since we don't know which comparative will be used i.e. TargetExact or TargetLower or TargetUpper we need to have at least one selected so we have M but since we don't know which one we've added O as that particular attribute may not the right one.

    The conformance should test that at least one of these 3 options is present.  Release 4.1 has been approved and the Open API table is being updated to reflect this change and a couple more changes.

    Johanne Mayer
    MayerConsult Inc