Hi David and all on this thread
I'm afraid that there is still no news on this API.
In general, on the point that David just raised, I wouldn't want to speculate on the interaction between resource porting API and other resource domain APIs. It does seem to me, however, that resource order might be over-the-top for resources that can be ported (e.g. TNs).
------------------------------
Jonathan Goldberg
Amdocs Management Limited
Any opinions and statements made by me on this forum are purely personal, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the TM Forum or my employer.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Jun 18, 2021 06:52
From: David Whitfield
Subject: API for number portability
Hey @Jonathan Goldberg,
We are also working through a Number portability requirement and whilst i understand that this API (698) is not ready i have a query about it.
I have been review the SID model for GB922 and it mentions that a NumberPortingRequest has a super class of ResourceOrder.
This made me draw the assumption that the status quo with the Open API's is that a number porting journey is best started by using the TMF652 resource ordering management. would you agree?
Even when this 698 API is ready whilst i did see the use use for a "resource portability" API why would the actual resource order to manage the port still not be raised via TMF652 which still seems to fit?
thanks
Dave
------------------------------
David Whitfield
TalkTalk Group
Original Message:
Sent: Jun 17, 2020 07:04
From: Jonathan Goldberg
Subject: API for number portability
According to the page you referenced, the proposed API does both the actual order (NumberPortabilityOrder) and the query (NumberPortabilityValidation).
If you think that there is something missing, please raise it, since you have access to the Confluence page you can presumably add comments, in the dedicated area at the bottom of the page.
------------------------------
Jonathan Goldberg
Amdocs Management Limited
Any opinions and statements made by me on this forum are purely personal, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the TM Forum or my employer.
Original Message:
Sent: Jun 17, 2020 02:43
From: Chio Chuan Ooi
Subject: API for number portability
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for the information.
I have go thru the document in https://projects.tmforum.org/wiki/display/AP/TMF698+Number+Portability, but it more related to Number Portability Order.
But I was looking more on API to query the owner of the service provider.
Not sure if there any focal that?
------------------------------
Chio Chuan Ooi
SingTel Optus
Original Message:
Sent: Jun 16, 2020 01:47
From: Jonathan Goldberg
Subject: API for number portability
Hi Chio
The Open API team is working on a new API, TMF698, for number portability (or more generally for resource portability). It's early days, and I have no visibility as to when the design will be complete.
If you have any design ideas or requirements, it would be a good idea to voice them here so that they can be considered.
Thanks in advance
------------------------------
Jonathan Goldberg
Amdocs Management Limited
Any opinions and statements made by me on this forum are purely personal, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the TM Forum or my employer.
Original Message:
Sent: Jun 15, 2020 23:10
From: Chio Chuan Ooi
Subject: API for number portability
Hi All,
I am working on to explore to expose the API to query the number for portability which is mainly to show the owner of the service provider.
when going thru the document gb922-resource-order-portability, it seem related to SID instead of the API.
I come across TMF639 Resource Inventory GET api, but not sure if is correct API as that API is more related to inventory rather than number portability.
Is that any other TMF Open API that more suitable as per now?
------------------------------
Chio Chuan Ooi
SingTel Optus
------------------------------