Hi All,I have a question about naming inconsistency between TMF622 OpenAPI (Product Ordering Management) and eTOM&SID&TAM.According to specs:1. eTOM: "Order Handling" core process in "Customer" domain.2. SID: "Customer Order ABE" in "Customer" domain.3. TAM: "Customer Order Management" application in "Customer" domain.4. OpenAPI: "ProductOrder" is used as a resource (model, naming etc).So the questions is:
What's the reason to have such naming inconsistency (customer vs product) between frameworks? In other words what's the reason to have different naming for data and integration models? Is there any benefit to have this inconsistency in solutions? is it planned to align naming for frameworks?