Open APIs

Expand all | Collapse all

TMF 629/632

  • 1.  TMF 629/632

    TM Forum Member
    Posted 15 days ago
    Dear Community,
    Is there any CTK package available to check TMF conformity of TMF 629 and 632 API implementations (Release 19.0.1) ?
    Regards
    Heinz

    ------------------------------
    Heinz Sandermann
    Deutsche Telekom AG
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: TMF 629/632

    TM Forum Member
    Posted 15 days ago
    Hi Heinz
    Published assets, including CTKs, are available via the Open API table here. You will see that both APIs have CTKs available.
    In case you are looking for other APIs that are still in progress, you can look at the early access table here.

    Hope it helps

    ------------------------------
    Jonathan Goldberg
    Amdocs Management Limited
    Any opinions and statements made by me on this forum are purely personal, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the TM Forum or my employer.
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: TMF 629/632

    TM Forum Member
    Posted 14 days ago
    Hi Heinz,

        Just be aware that the current CTK available for TMF629 via open API table is not according to TMF specifcation document, since that on the specification the mandatory attributes are name and engagedParty, but on the CTK only name is required.


    ------------------------------
    Adinan Sousa
    Ericsson Inc.
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: TMF 629/632

    TM Forum Member
    Posted 14 days ago
    Hi Heinz,

       Just be aware that the current CTK available for TMF629 via Open API table is not according to TMF specification document, since that on the specification the mandatory attributes are name and engagedParty, but on the CTK only name is required as mandatory.

    ------------------------------
    Adinan Sousa
    Ericsson Inc.
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: TMF 629/632

    TM Forum Member
    Posted 13 days ago
    Thanks Adinan
    This is a known defect in the CTK, since engagedParty is indeed a mandatory attribute of PartyRole (it's the party who's playing the role, you cannot have a party role without a party) - and since Customer is a specialization of PartyRole also Customer should have mandatory engagedParty.
    At some point the CTK will be fixed, not quite sure how and when, since this does impact API implementers who have already achieved formal conformance for TMF629.

    ------------------------------
    Jonathan Goldberg
    Amdocs Management Limited
    Any opinions and statements made by me on this forum are purely personal, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the TM Forum or my employer.
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: TMF 629/632

    TM Forum Member
    Posted 13 days ago
    Hi Jonathan, hi Adinan,
    Many thanks for your valuable feedback !
    Heinz

    ------------------------------
    Heinz Sandermann
    Deutsche Telekom AG
    ------------------------------