Open APIs

 View Only

  • 1.  TM 645 V4- Documentation

    Posted Feb 10, 2021 20:22
    Edited by Uma Lakshman Feb 10, 2021 20:26

    Hi ,

     Would like to understand your view on the below discrepancies noticed  in  TMF- 645 V4 documentation . 

    #

    Description

    Task

    1

    checkServiceQualification to checkServiceQualificationItem  association  in resource model  is marked as 0 to * . As per conformance profile and swagger, this  association is M

    checkServiceQualification

    2

    queryServiceQualification to searchCriteria association  in resource model  is marked as 0 to * . As per conformance profile and swagger, this  association is M

    queryServiceQualification

    3

    Service.feature.name is mandatory  as per swagger . Conformance profile doesn't have it marked as M

    checkServiceQualification, queryServiceQualification

    4

    Conformance profile has name repeated as mandatory  for featureRelationshsip .

    As per the schema, only  name and relationshipType are mandatory. Is there any additional attribute expected to be mandatory ?

     

     

    checkServiceQualification, queryServiceQualification

    5

    Below sub resources are named in correctly in documentation .  Not sure if this is a tooling issue

    ConstraintRef relationship

    ResourceRef relationship 

    ServiceCategoryRef relationship 

    ServiceSpecificationRef relationship

     

     

     

    checkServiceQualification, queryServiceQualification

     



    ------------------------------
    Thanks & Regards,
    Uma Lakshman
    Telstra Corporation
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: TM 645 V4- Documentation

    Posted Feb 11, 2021 03:09
    Hello Uma,

    For 1 & 2 please consider swagger and conformance profile. The UML is informative and we have some isuue regarding cardinality. I checked for you the root yaml used for generation and in both case mentionned attributes are mandatory.
    For 3 &4  we need to raise a Jira - Looking in other Service API seem that we have some divergence in feature mandatory representation. Globally service.feature has name and featureCharacteristic mandatory ; service.feature.featureCharacteristic  has name and value.... But Service Inventory conformance profile mention also service.feature id as mandatory. We need probably an alignement there.
    Not sure to understand point 5. - can you elaborate the issue (or directly raise a jira if you identified a doc issue).

    Thanks

    Ludovic

    ------------------------------
    Ludovic Robert
    Orange
    My answer are my own & don't represent necessarily my company or the TMF
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: TM 645 V4- Documentation

    Posted Feb 11, 2021 16:49

    Thanks @Ludovic Robert.

     

    I cans see that you have already raised jira  for issues # 3 and 4 . 

    Please refer jira for issue #5.

     

     

    ​

    ------------------------------
    Uma Lakshman
    Telstra Corporation
    ------------------------------

    Original Message


Related Content