Hi All,
As per TMF design guidelines mentioned in section 11 called "Versioning" from TMF630_REST_API_Design_Guidelines_3.0_Part_1 _R17.5.1
- REST APIs MUST state version with "v" following the API Name, e.g.: APIName/v1/resource. Or troubleTicket/v1/troubleTicket
- The schema associated with a REST API must have its version number aligned with that of the REST API.
The format for the API version number is defined as:
{serverRoot}/{apiName}/{apiVersion}
where
{apiName} is the name of the API
{apiVersion} is the version of the API (e.g. v1)
{serverRoot} is implementation specific (e.g.: https://mycsp.com:8080 )
https://mycsp.com:8080/cx/industry/tmf-api/troubleTicket/v3/troubleTicket/3180
https://mycsp.com:8080/cx/industry/tmf-api/troubleTicket/v4/troubleTicket/3180
This Above approach enables us to adhere to manage an implementation code across changing versions of TMF Open API releases.
As our implementation is SaaS based, and internally we will be delivering code changes to support functional enhancements on a monthly cadence.
Hence there is a need for us to manage an internal implementation code version across a specific version of TMF Open API release.
For example:
https://mycsp.com:8080/cx/industry/tmf-api/v1/troubleTicket/v3/troubleTicket/3180
https://mycsp.com:8080/cx/industry/tmf-api/v2/troubleTicket/v3/troubleTicket/3180
https://mycsp.com:8080/cx/industry/tmf-api/v1/troubleTicket/v4/troubleTicket/3180
https://mycsp.com:8080/cx/industry/tmf-api/v2/troubleTicket/v4/troubleTicket/3180
This Above approach enables us to adhere to manage an implementation code version both internally and across changing versions of TMF Open API releases.
Please let us know if this approach is acceptable by TMF guidelines are or do we need to make any changes to the nomenclature of URL so that we are able to manage an implementation code version both internally and across changing versions of TMF Open API releases.
Thanks,
------------------------------
Syed Javed
Oracle Corporation
------------------------------