Open APIs

 View Only
Login to Join

About this Community:

Use this community as your go-to resource to discuss anything and everything relating to TM Forum Open APIs:

  • learn how to implement them
  • post ideas and requirement for new types of APIs
  • share how you are using APIs
  • discuss domain specific applications

This is an open discussion area. TM Forum also has collaborative project work on Open APIs. To find out more click here

Latest Discussion Posts

  • Hi, I didn't think TMF645 keep intent implicit. I thought it just doesn't care. Its job (assuming POST Check) is just to tell you if SSpec A is technically activable (for instance at the customer's location). Would you mind to share examples ...

  • Hi Jiri, Regarding TMF645: The flat structure in TMF645 is by design and there is no other way. Nesting implies a containment hierarchy but in the SID: Only atomic Product Offerings have a ProductSpecification . atomic Product Offerings ...

  • Hi Jiri, This is a very relevant question - I've been analysing how different TMF APIs express "change intent," and I noticed the same asymmetry you mentioned. From my observation: TMF641 expresses intent explicitly through ...

  • Hi all, from a product-domain client (POCV/PODOM) point of view, TMF645 Check Service Qualification and TMF641 Service Order look quite similar: in both cases the client typically decomposes Product → CFS , and in the service domain (SQM, SOM) ...

  • Hi all, we are implementing TMFC009 Service Qualification Management with TMF645 v5 (focusing on CheckServiceQualification ) together with TMFC002 Service Order Capture and Validation (POCV) and TMF641 Service Order. In TMF641, each ServiceOrderItem ...

Announcements