We solve it by adding the attribute
lifecycleStatusValidFor
to ServiceSpecification and ResourceSpecification:
"lifecycleStatusValidFor": {
"type": "array",
"description": "The available lifecycle status with the validFor TimePeriod",
"items": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/LifecycleStatusValidFor"
}
},
Here the referred Type:
"LifecycleStatusValidFor": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Represents a LifecycleStatus with validFor TimePeriod",
"properties": {
"lifecycleStatus": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The lifecycleStatus"
},
"validFor": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/TimePeriod",
"description": "The period for which this lifecycleStatus is valid"
}
}
},
------------------------------
Florian Kammermann
Swisscom (Schweiz) AG
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Dec 04, 2024 08:51
From: Florian Kammermann
Subject: Multiple lifecycleStatus with validFor in the same ServiceSpecification / ResourceSpecification
We have the following Situation:
- per Service / Resource Specification we track the different lifecycleStatus with startDate and endDate
- means a ServiceSpecification can have
- lifecycleState=Active, startDate=2018-03-25T00:00, endDate=2024-03-25T00:00
- lifecycleState=PhaseOut, startDate=2024-03-26T00:00, endDate=2025-03-25T00:00
- .....
Looking at the ServiceSpecification json Schema I see the Attribute lifecycleStatus and validFor, with startDate and endDate.
Means I would have to generate one ServiceSpecification Object per lifecycleStatus.
This is not, how we want to communicate the different lifecycleStatus and their startDate/endDate.
Are there alternatives to the approach of creating multiple ServiceSpecification Objects?
Can we probably (ab)use the ServiceSpecCharacteristics to communicate the different lifecycleStatus?
------------------------------
Florian Kammermann
Swisscom (Schweiz) AG
------------------------------