Open APIs

 View Only
  • 1.  TMF 639- Clarifications

    TM Forum Member
    Posted Oct 25, 2024 09:15

    Hi All,

    We are planning to start some certification process on TMF 639. I would like some clarifications regarding the model. We have Physical Resource Model for Network devices.

    •  "resourceRelationship"- Is the Relationshiptype enum open to definition of our own values for ENUM?
    •  "resourceRelationship- Incase we are have ports that belong to a shelf and the shelf belongs to a device. Can we we include both Shelf and Device in the same call? i.e. can the parents be returned in  "resourceRelationship"
    • "relatedParty":  Can you mention Related parties not included in the resource model i.e. Logical resources or services that belong to TMF638?

    Regards,

    Hasan



    ------------------------------
    Hasan Chaudhry
    Digitata Networks
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: TMF 639- Clarifications

    TM Forum Member
    Posted Oct 28, 2024 21:45

    Hi Hasan

    Yes the relationshipType field in the resourceRelationship is a string and you can define your own values.  For the ability to query all relating entities, please see this thread on the community https://engage.tmforum.org/discussion/resource-inventory-management-tmf369-how-to-do-filtering-for-indirect-relationship

    Sorry, but I don't understand your query on the relatedParty, please can you elaborate?



    ------------------------------
    Dan d'Albuquerque
    Individual
    ------------------------------