Matthieu, you are looking at an older beta version, which I designed some months ago. In that earlier version, BGPO was not in itself an addressable entity, rather it was an enhanced reference to an entity (Product Offering), tailored to the fact that it was contained in a group. Since then, we made some changes as suggested by Lutz and this entity is now semantically different. Hopefully the new model will be published very soon (around DTW time if all goes well).
------------------------------
Jonathan Goldberg
Amdocs Management Limited
Any opinions and statements made by me on this forum are purely personal, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the TM Forum or my employer.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Aug 22, 2023 08:35
From: Matthieu Hattab
Subject: TMF620 V5 - BundledGroupProductOffering should have id
doesn't it have one already?

In general I support Id for all customer-facing entities in the product catalogue, mostly in the interest of mapping these entities to a CMS so we can customise the CX with specific text or pictures per sales channels etc
------------------------------
Kind regards,
Matthieu Hattab
Lyse Platform
Original Message:
Sent: Aug 21, 2023 04:45
From: Lutz Bettge
Subject: TMF620 V5 - BundledGroupProductOffering should have id
Should the new BundledGroupProductOffering have an ID so that it is possible to re-use a bundeling structure in other Product Offerings?
------------------------------
Lutz Bettge
Deutsche Telekom AG
------------------------------