This probably makes sense, Caul.
FYI see this recent discussion on a similar topic - the original poster wants to use Address directly rather than Site in reference from Resource.
https://engage.tmforum.org/discussion/representing-place-in-639-api?ReturnUrl=%2fbrowse%2fallrecentposts
------------------------------
Jonathan Goldberg
Amdocs Management Limited
Any opinions and statements made by me on this forum are purely personal, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the TM Forum or my employer.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Jul 10, 2023 14:06
From: Caui Leal
Subject: Site Build (Central) information should be storage in a Resource Inventory Management?
Just to informe, we split Resource Inventory solution and Site Management and used a correlation ID to associate the resources and site address.
------------------------------
Caui Leal
Telefonica Brasil S.A.
Original Message:
Sent: Sep 01, 2022 16:46
From: Caui Leal
Subject: Site Build (Central) information should be storage in a Resource Inventory Management?
We are deploying a new Resource Inventory to manage RAN (Radio Access) and internal network elements/equipments (OLTs). However, Site Build information (address, status, site name, site position etc) seens that should be storage in a Site Management and be referenced in our new Resource Inventory, is it correct or Site information (address, status, site name, site position etc) should be storage in a Resource Inventory?
#OpenDigitalArchitecture
#General
------------------------------
Caui Leal
Telefonica Brasil S.A.
------------------------------