Open APIs

 View Only
Login to Join

About this Community:

Use this community as your go-to resource to discuss anything and everything relating to TM Forum Open APIs:

  • learn how to implement them
  • post ideas and requirement for new types of APIs
  • share how you are using APIs
  • discuss domain specific applications

This is an open discussion area. TM Forum also has collaborative project work on Open APIs. To find out more click here

Latest Discussion Posts

  • Having given this some more thought, there was a danger of trying to overcomplicate it and end up trying to replicate the level of the OASIS standards for ebXML which I think goes too far. However, there is value I think in providing a method of managing ...

  • Hi @David Whitfield , My understanding of TMF641 and TMF638 is also aligned with your first two bullet points​. Regarding the third bullet, the scenario is not clear to me. Is it talking about a major version upgarde of service specification to an existing ...

  • Hi Jonathan, exactly. Since the "rangeStep" is used within the SID Common Domain I guess it make sense to extend all TMF OpenAPIs that are using some sort of CharacteristicValueSpecification. So far I'm currently working more within the Service Domain ...

    1 person likes this.
  • Hello David For me, yes for the first 2 bullet points. the service representation in the order item should not change accordingly to the inventory. So you can have a different representation looking in 641 vs 638 but service & order.item state help to ...

  • hey @Anu Aulakh and @Ludovic Robert , I was similarly aligned that when you pass a service order item with action = 'MODIFY' to complete service changes to an existing service (order to ADD said service could have been months/years ago). that you ...