Thanks Jonathan & Matthieu,
For pointing me in the right direction... I have access to these documents.
I have a few quick observations on TMF620 that I would like to clarify:
- Many figures in the document are missing - I assume these are currently being updated for final release?
- The @type and @baseType are missing from the table descriptions, is this done deliberately?
- The Lifecycle State model states "Conception" whereas previously it was "Concept"... maybe it's just me but should "Concept" be the correct term to use here?
- Sample json does not match the tables
If you want to email me a word version (
pb@bainz.co.nz), I can put the correction in and send it back to you.
Thanks again
Pete
------------------------------
Pete Bains
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Oct 19, 2022 05:53
From: Jonathan Goldberg
Subject: OpenAPi version 3
The beta (early access) Open API page is this link: https://projects.tmforum.org/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=128855518
You may need to register as a user of the TMF website in order to access the beta page.
------------------------------
Jonathan Goldberg
Amdocs Management Limited
Any opinions and statements made by me on this forum are purely personal, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the TM Forum or my employer.
Original Message:
Sent: Oct 16, 2022 18:42
From: Pete Bains
Subject: OpenAPi version 3
Thank you Matthieu,
I will work through these early versions.
Much appreciated
Pete
------------------------------
Pete Bains
UNSPECIFIED
Original Message:
Sent: Oct 12, 2022 09:45
From: Matthieu Hattab
Subject: OpenAPi version 3
The API Wiki page contains Early Adoption / BETA APIs
------------------------------
Kind regards,
Matthieu Hattab
Lyse Platform
Original Message:
Sent: Oct 11, 2022 17:16
From: Pete Bains
Subject: OpenAPi version 3
Hi,
I am keen to align the design of the TMF Open API to the latest version of the OpenAPI v3 and was hoping if I can get early access/guidance on what the structure of for this will look like for TMF6520, 622, 637 or 679. Is there any opportunity to get an early insight on this? and can provide assistance if required in providing feedback.
Thanks
Pete
------------------------------
Pete Bains
UNSPECIFIED
------------------------------