TM Forum Community

 View Only

Proper "feasibilityChecked" spelling in TMF638

  • 1.  Proper "feasibilityChecked" spelling in TMF638

    Posted 2 days ago

    This is my first message, so my apologies in advance if I'm breaking some netiquette.

    There is some inconsistent spelling in TMF 638. The OpenAPI specification uses "feasibilityChecked" (with an i), but the User guide shows  "feasabilityChecked" (with an a) . I am referring to version 5.0 in both cases.

    This has caused some discussions with customers about what an interface should return. My understanding is that feasibilityChecked (with an i) is the correct spelling and therefore and the one that interfaces should use. I.e. OpenAPI spec is correct and UserGuide has a type.

    I wanted anyway to have full confirmation from this list.

    Thanks in advance;

        Juan Postlbauer


    #General

    ------------------------------
    Juan Postlbauer
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise
    ------------------------------