Hi,
in v4 only the main resource object had a separate Entity_Create/Entity_Update schema for object creation/update. I noticed that in v5, (specifically in schema for service usage api) not only the main resource, but all subresources have separate FVO/MVO schemas. But I didn't see any subresource FVO/MVO schema which would differ from its regular schema (I may have missed something though). Also, some schemas do not have their FVO counterpart, for example EnittyRef has EntityRef_MVO, but not EntityRef_FVO. So, I have the following questions:
- is there a reason why almost entire model has FVO/MVO counterparts, not only main resource schema?
- if there are schemas which do not always have FVO/MVO counterpart, like EntityRef, is it an error or is there a reason for it?
- will there be a situation in which a subresource schema for creation/update will be different than its main schema?
------------------------------
Piotr Ledwoń
Suntech S.A.
------------------------------