The SID model statuses seems more aligned with the 'operatingStatus' introduced in v5. This has values "pending", "configured", "running", "degraded", "failed", etc.
But even these are not fully aligned.
I would like to hear an opinion from a TMF expert.
------------------------------
Plamen Stanoev
Ericsson Inc.
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Mar 12, 2025 05:22
From: Tibor Ujszászi
Subject: Statuses of Service class in TMF68 Service Inventory Management API
We are implementing a new ServiceInventory function. During the design phase we faced an inconsistence between SID model and TMF638 API definition.
eg.: the SID model define the statuses of Customer Facing Service that may be the following enumerated values: 0: Operational and billable; 1: Degraded but billable; 2: In Violation and billable; 3: Operational but not billable; 4: In Test and not billable; 5: Being Deployed and not billable; 6: Failed. Ont he other hand the Service Inventory Management API v5.0 definies the following statuses for Service class: feasibilityChecked, designed, reserved, inactive, active, terminated, suspended.
How should we interpret these two definitions for service status?
------------------------------
Tibor Ujszászi
Magyar Telekom Plc.
------------------------------