Skip main navigation (Press Enter).
Log in
Toggle navigation
Home
Communities
My communities
All communities
Directory
Browse
Discussion Posts
Library Entries
Blogs
Log in
Search
×
All Content
3702
Announcements
30
Communities
5
Discussion Threads
3398
Library Entries
263
Volunteer Opportunities
1
Web Pages
5
More Filters
Community
Hidden H4 Anchor
Open APIs (2811)
TM Forum Community (882)
ODA Components & Canvas (1)
Test Project for Non-Member and Member Joining (1)
Formal Tags
Hidden H4 Anchor
General (335)
Open Digital Architecture (174)
Zero Touch Automation (107)
Customer Experience (78)
Digital Transformation Maturity (67)
Digital Ecosystems (59)
AI and Data (54)
IoT and Smart City (41)
Business Assurance (40)
Blockchain (31)
Diversity and Inclusion (15)
SID (1)
Show 2 More
Show Less
Comments
Hidden H4 Anchor
No (118)
Yes (22)
User Tags
Hidden H4 Anchor
1 (1)
2 (1)
3 (1)
4 (1)
@ Mentions
Hidden H4 Anchor
Alan Pope (1)
Alfred Anaya-Dubernard (1)
Jonathan Burg (1)
Jonathan Goldberg (1)
Ketki Mujumdar (1)
Created
Hidden H4 Anchor
Within One Week (2)
Within Two Weeks (3)
Within One Month (10)
Within Six Months (67)
Within One Year (168)
Older (3533)
3702 results found for ""
Sort By:
Relevance
Most Recent
Least Recent
Discussion Thread
1
characterisitc object association in TMF648
Mahesh Choudhari
Added 3 hours ago
View Community
Discussion Thread
1
TMF648 to MEF115 API quote API mapping
Mahesh Choudhari
Added 3 days ago
View Community
Discussion Thread
1
Resource Domain - Resource Strategy and Plan ABE
Eva Katrin Brosche
Added 11 days ago
View Community
Discussion Thread
2
Tokenization/DeTokenization API
Ajay Saini
Added 18 days ago
View Community
Discussion Thread
1
Hi everyone, I need some guidance regarding **TMF CTK**. For example, suppose I have an API that is designed to support **only the POST operation**. * In **v4**, the CTK still runs. The **POST** test cases pass, while the **GET** and **PATCH** test cases fail because those operations are not implemented. * In **v5**, the CTK appears to require **GET**, **POST**, and **PATCH** to be implemented. If only **POST** is available, the CTK does not run successfully. Is this the expected behavior in **v5**? Is it mandatory to implement all the standard operations, even if the API is intended to support only **POST**? Could someone please guide me on the recommended approach? Thanks in advance!
priyanshu chaudhary
Added 18 days ago
View Community
Discussion Thread
1
TMF CTK Compliance – Handling Extra Endpoints and Mock Implementations follow-up
priyanshu chaudhary
Added 18 days ago
View Community
Discussion Thread
2
TMF 670 API Conformance and Yaml file discrepancy
Venkateswari Moorthy
Added 18 days ago
View Community
Discussion Thread
1
TMF CTK Compliance – Handling Extra Endpoints and Mock Implementations
priyanshu chaudhary
Added 20 days ago
View Community
Discussion Thread
3
Creating Risk Categories and New Risk Types in TMF696
Manikanth Nalam
Added 21 days ago
View Community
Discussion Thread
1
TMF 697 - Unable to find api directory
segin Robert
Added 26 days ago
View Community
Showing 1-10 of 3702 results
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
…
»
»»
Contact Us
Email:
info@tmforum.org
Membership
Membership
Learn More
Privacy & Terms
About Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright 2025. All rights reserved.
Powered by Higher Logic